Auntie Charo's Soapbox

There was but one judge that attended what was like the state of the AG's report card reading for the last year at the Legislature. Few senators didn't think enough to attend. Did it make them look good by not attending? No! It just meant that it wasn't important enough to attend showing the people that they represent that they can't really work with every branch of the government and that they take 'things personally' and that if things don't go their way, they choose the highway. The gov didn't go and I think I can understand why he chose not to, but I can't, for the life of me, figure out why the judges of the Superior and Supreme Court boycotted the speech. What does that say to the public? Does it mean that they are so disdainful of the AG that they just think everything he does is trash and that he and his staff mean so little that nothing he has to say is worth getting dressed up for?
It sends mixed messages to the kids at UOG who are attending college who think that members of the various branches of government should get along, if not personally, on a civil basis. Boybotting such meetings as today shows no respect for the office. You don't have to like the man, but there were invited dignataries, their absence boycotted them as well!
That those people weren't there shows the very reason why Mr. Moylan had such a hard time doing his job for the last four years. I'm sure that who ever gets the job will have the same lack of cooperation. People don't want to share their empires.